Archival, not print. Self-contained files built to outlive their software.
| ISO reference | ISO 19005-1:2005, 19005-2:2011, 19005-3:2012 |
|---|---|
| Based on | PDF 1.4 for A-1, PDF 1.7 for A-2 and A-3 |
| Purpose | Long-term archiving |
| Transparency | Not allowed in A-1, permitted from A-2 |
| Colour spaces | Device-independent, colour must be unambiguously defined |
PDF/A solves a different problem from PDF/X. PDF/X asks will this print correctly at that shop. PDF/A asks will this still open and look identical in thirty years, on software nobody has written yet.
The answer, in both cases, is achieved by removing external dependencies.
PDF/A-1 (2005, based on PDF 1.4) is the strictest. No transparency, no layers, no JPEG 2000. Files conforming to it are extremely conservative and extremely portable.
PDF/A-2 (2011, based on PDF 1.7) permits transparency, layers and JPEG 2000, and allows embedding other PDF/A files. For most new archival work this is the sensible target.
PDF/A-3 (2012) adds one significant capability: it may embed arbitrary file types, not just PDF/A. That is what makes electronic invoicing formats such as Factur-X and ZUGFeRD possible, where a human-readable invoice carries the machine-readable XML inside it.
This is the part that confuses people, and it is simpler than it looks.
PDF/A-1b is by far the most commonly requested, because it is achievable from almost any source document. PDF/A-1a requires the source to have been authored with real structure, which most are not.
Usually because somebody requires it: court e-filing, government records, regulated industries and long-term document retention. If a submission portal rejected your file, the requirement is almost always a specific PDF/A level, and the rejection message will name it.
Conformance is not something you can confirm by eye. Upload a PDF and Filecheck reports which standard it actually conforms to, and what would have to change. Free, no signup, files deleted after processing.